
Home Page
Research
Teaching
Publications
Lab Members
Data Files
Images
Contact Us
Links
|
|
The Morphology of
Maize and Teosinte
John Doebley
Laboratory of Genetics
University of Wisconsin-Madison
© John Doebley 2003
|
|
Much of the interest and controversy surrounding the domestication
of maize arises from the fact that these two plants have such strikingly
different morphologies. On this page, I will describe the differences in
plant and inflorescence morphology between maize and teosinte following
the system that my lab has used in its QTL studies. The differences are
complex and there is no substitute for actually sitting down at a
microscope with the plants in hand. Some useful publications on maize
and teosinte morphology are listed below.
Plant Architecture: Teosinte plants have
main stalks that typically bear an elongate lateral branch at most nodes
(Figure 1). The lateral branches and the main stalk are both composed of
a series of nodes and elongated (15 or more cm long) internodes with a
leaf attached at each node.
The number of internodes (or leaves) in each lateral branch is
roughly equivalent to the number in the main stalk above the point of
attachment of the branch. Thus, a branch attached on the third node
below the main tassel will be composed of about three internodes, while
one attached at the sixth node below the tassel will have about six
internodes. The leaves along the lateral branches are fully formed and
composed of two parts -- a sheath that clasps around the stem and a blade
that extends away from the plant. The leaves on the branches are arranged
in an alternate phyllotaxy, i.e. each leaf is borne on the opposite side of
the stem relative to the leaves at the nodes above and below. Both the main
stem and the primary lateral branches of the teosinte plant are tipped by
male inflorescences (tassels) while the slender female inflorescences (ears)
of teosinte are borne on secondary branches in the axils of the leaves along
the primary branches. Each of these female inflorescences is surrounded by
a single, bladeless leaf or husk. The ears occur in clusters of 1 to 5 (or
more) at each node along the branch.
|
|
The architecture of the lateral branches of the maize plant is strikingly
different from that of teosinte (Fig. 1). Maize typically produces branches at
only two or three of the nodes along the main stem. Axillary buds are present
at some of the other nodes but they are arrested early in development. Each of
the branches that are produced is composed of nodes and short internodes,
averaging about 1 cm in length. Unlike teosinte, the number of internodes in the
lateral branch is greater than the number in the main stalk above the point of
attachment of the branch. For maize line W22, a branch attached at the fifth node
below the main tassel will be composed of about 12 internodes and have 12 husk
leaves. The leaves (husks) along the lateral branch are composed largely of sheath
with only a small (if any) blade attached to it. The husks are arranged in a spiral
phyllotaxy along the branch, rather than the alternate phyllotaxy for leaves on
the main stem of the plant. Secondary branches are normally absent (aborted).
Finally, the lateral branch is terminated by a female inflorescence or ear, which
is tightly enclosed within the spirally arranged husks because of the failure of
the internodes of the branch to fully elongate.
|

Figure 1
|
|
The divergent morphologies of maize and teosinte lateral branches reveal the
complex set of evolutionary changes involved in the origin of maize plant
architecture. These include (1) arresting the full elongation of the internodes,
(2) arresting the growth of the leaf blade, (3) arresting the outgrowth of some
axillary buds, (4) suppressing the outgrowth of secondary branches, (5)
increasing the number of leaves (husks) formed on the branch, (6) changing leaf
(husk) phyllotaxy from alternate to spiral, and (7) replacing the tassel
(male inflorescence) at the tip of the lateral branch with an ear (female
inflorescence). Noticeably, most of these changes involve arresting the growth
of particular organs. This suggests that a common developmental process (repression
of organ growth) expressed at distinct points in space or time of organogenesis
produced this suite of correlated changes (see tb1 and the evolution of maize).
|

Figure 2
|

Figure 3
|
|
Inflorescence Architecture: The most dramatic
differences between maize and teosinte involve the architecture of their female
inflorescences (Figs. 2 and 3). The teosinte ear is composed of 5 to 10 (or more)
distichously (in two ranks) arranged cupulate fruitcases. The cupule of the cupulate
fruitcase is formed from the invaginated rachis internode (RA). The cupule contains
a single sessile spikelet that is oriented parallel to the axis of the rachis. The
outer glume (OG) of this sessile spikelet seals the opening of the cupule, thus
obscuring the kernel from view. Both the rachis internode and its outer glume are
highly indurated in teosinte. The cupulate fruitcases are separated from one another
by abscission layers, thus enabling the fruitcases to separate (disarticulate) at
maturity for dispersal.
The cob (rachis) of the maize ear, like that of its teosinte counterpart, is
composed of invaginated internodes or cupules (Figs. 2 and 3). Maize cupules are
arranged polystichously (in four or more ranks) around the circumference of the ear
with usually 100 or more cupules in a single ear (Fig. 2). Unlike teosinte, the cupules
of maize are shallow, often collapsed, and they do not envelop the kernels (Figs. 2
and 3). Maize cupules may be indurate, but the outer glumes are softer than the highly
indurated glumes of the teosinte ear. In contrast to teosinte, there are two spikelets
associated with each cupule, one pedicellate and the other sessile. Thus, an ear with
four ranks of cupules will have eight rows of kernels (Fig. 3). The female spikelets
of maize also differ from those of teosinte in that they are oriented perpendicular and
not parallel to the axis of the ear. Finally, maize ears lack abscission layers as found
in teosinte, so the ear remains intact at maturity.
Annotated Bibliography:
- Iltis, H. H. 2000. Homeotic sexual translocations and the origin of maize (Zea
mays, Poaceae): A new look at an old problem. Economic Botany 54: 7-42.
[This article has a detailed description of branch formation in teosinte including an
extensive set of illustrations.]
- Weatherwax, Paul. 1935. The phylogeny of Zea mays. Amer. Midl. Naturalist.
16:1-71. [This article has some of the oldest and most detailed illustrations
of teosinte and other relatives of maize.]
|
Home
|
Return to Top
|
|